Jay-Z moves to prevent $119,000 in debt from being wiped out in bankruptcy case related to man claiming to be rapper’s son: Report |


Jay-Z moves to block $119,000 debt wiped out in bankruptcy case related to man claiming to be rapper's son: report
Jay-Z moves to block $119,000 debt wiped out in bankruptcy case related to man claiming to be rapper’s son: report

Jay-Z has filed new legal documents in an attempt to prevent a $119,000 judgment against Rymir Satterthwaite’s godmother Lillie Coley from being discharged through bankruptcy.The rapper made the request during Coley’s ongoing bankruptcy proceedings, arguing that the debt should remain enforceable because it arose from conduct involving fraud and harassment, rather than ordinary financial obligations, TMZ reported.

Jay-Z says debt should survive bankruptcy

In court documents obtained by TMZ, Jay-Z argued that the $119,000 in his favor should not be wiped out because the court found it was related to Coley’s fraudulent statements and misrepresentations “designed to harass and target” him.His legal team also alleges that Coley engaged in what they said was a campaign of harassment through repeated legal actions and public statements over the past decade.According to the filing, Jay-Z faced “numerous baseless court filings, online harassment campaigns and public statements” from Coley over the years.

long run Parent-child disputes

The latest filing relates to the long-running legal battle involving Rymir Satterthwaite, who has claimed for years that Jay-Z is his biological father.Rimel claimed that his late mother, Wanda Satterthwaite, had a relationship with the rapper that led to his birth. Jay-Z has always denied the accusations and has challenged them in court.According to the documents, every lawsuit Curley filed against him was dismissed. Jay-Z also claims he has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees defending himself against repeated lawsuits.

Coley questions Jay-Z’s application

Kohli asked the court to dismiss Jay-Z’s latest petition, saying it failed to meet various procedural requirements.The bankruptcy case is still pending, and the court has not decided whether the $119,000 judgment can be vacated.



Source link

Post Comment

You May Have Missed